The most popular online travel guide to Russia, since 2001.
 

Way to Russia Community and Forum

Way to Russia warm-up: place both your hands in front of you and then count one word for each finger, starting from the left thumb: "Conversation Is a Way of Finding Out What You Think".

 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   ChatChat   Log inLog in 

A man for all seasons?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Way to Russia Talk Lounge Forum Index -> Talk Lounge
Author Message
staleek
Frequent Guest


Joined: 09 Sep 2007
Posts: 27
Location: Rochester, NY USA

PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 6:47 pm    Post subject: A man for all seasons? Reply with quote

Putin has been chosen as Time magazine's "Person Of The Year." (video excerpt is here:) http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/personoftheyear/article/0,28804,1690753_1691763_1691291,00.html

As Time puts it;

"TIME's Person of the Year is not and never has been an honor. It is not an endorsement. It is not a popularity contest. At its best, it is a clear-eyed recognition of the world as it is and of the most powerful individuals and forces shaping that world—for better or for worse. It is ultimately about leadership—bold, earth-changing leadership. Putin is not a boy scout. He is not a democrat in any way that the West would define it. He is not a paragon of free speech. He stands, above all, for stability—stability before freedom, stability before choice, stability in a country that has hardly seen it for a hundred years."

Watch the interview, and then I would love to hear opinions, of which I am sure there are many........
Back to top
surfguy
Lounge Wizard


Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 6979

PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 8:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ultimately it it up to russia to decide how they shall be govern...however when our nation is threatened then we have a duty and a right to protect ourselves by what ever means necessary. Lets see what Putin will continue to offer and we can only hope that the Russian people will gain better standards of living.

I felt that the interview could have been done better by a high school kid...very amatuer IMO...the questions were very generic. I actually like the next story Time did on Russia...really nice scenery that made me want to travel and actully got me excited to leve next week on my upcoming journey.
Back to top
mister_wizzz
VIP


Joined: 27 May 2004
Posts: 582

PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 8:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Time magazine has chosen Putin better than Al Gore...
What a shame.
Back to top
staleek
Frequent Guest


Joined: 09 Sep 2007
Posts: 27
Location: Rochester, NY USA

PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 9:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mister_wizzz wrote:
Time magazine has chosen Putin better than Al Gore...
What a shame.


Not better. Read the quote in my original post........
Back to top
surfguy
Lounge Wizard


Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 6979

PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 9:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

fuck Al Gore...the guy is a total sham!!!
Back to top
staleek
Frequent Guest


Joined: 09 Sep 2007
Posts: 27
Location: Rochester, NY USA

PostPosted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 9:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is a more expansive take on the interview:

http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/personoftheyear/article/0,28804,1690753_1690757_1690766-1,00.html
Back to top
gomer
WayToRussified


Joined: 30 Mar 2007
Posts: 446

PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 2:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe someone at TIME Magazine visits WTR's Talk Lounge and reads the posts praising Putin's Presidency.
Back to top
mr-barley
Lounge Lizard


Joined: 04 Dec 2004
Posts: 159
Location: somewhere in minnesota

PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Al Gore is too busy making money off "global warming" to be Man of the Year. He's such a whore.
Back to top
darthvader
WayToRussified


Joined: 09 Dec 2005
Posts: 427

PostPosted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Many people have gotten person of the year (of course): the good, the bad and the fugly. Its all to do with influence I suppose.........

For example, Hitler (1938), Stalin (1939), Krushchev (1957) got TIME'S "Man of the Year" too.

TIME can certainly pick 'em. Smile
Back to top
greg222
VIP


Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Posts: 599

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 7:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm about halfway through the transcript of the interview. Merits aside, I don't know that Time could have chosen a more fascinating person. I wish they had pressed him harder on his rise to power. Probably it would have gotten them nowhere, but any little snippets as to how Putin reached his position would be interesting.

One thing I found particularly intriguing: while questioning him about his suppression of political opposition, Putin makes the point that with his approval ratings he really doesn't need to worry about other parties in terms of competition. Then from his evasive answers to the follow-up questions, you get the feeling that his motivation for keeping opposition to a minimum is some obsessive paranoia about foreign influence in Russian politics. Not so much because of the threat it poses to his power, but out of principle.
Back to top
jo-jo-7
Just Starting


Joined: 16 Mar 2010
Posts: 0

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

darthvader wrote:
Many people have gotten person of the year (of course): the good, the bad and the fugly. Its all to do with influence I suppose.........

For example, Hitler (1938), Stalin (1939), Krushchev (1957) got TIME'S "Man of the Year" too.

TIME can certainly pick 'em. Smile


TIME picked Stalin twice...
Back to top
darthvader
WayToRussified


Joined: 09 Dec 2005
Posts: 427

PostPosted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

greg222 wrote:
I'm about halfway through the transcript of the interview. Merits aside, I don't know that Time could have chosen a more fascinating person. I wish they had pressed him harder on his rise to power. Probably it would have gotten them nowhere, but any little snippets as to how Putin reached his position would be interesting.

One thing I found particularly intriguing: while questioning him about his suppression of political opposition, Putin makes the point that with his approval ratings he really doesn't need to worry about other parties in terms of competition. Then from his evasive answers to the follow-up questions, you get the feeling that his motivation for keeping opposition to a minimum is some obsessive paranoia about foreign influence in Russian politics. Not so much because of the threat it poses to his power, but out of principle.


Well written points, Greg. Putin certainly is a fascinating story. TIME's expanded interview summary was a great read.

As far as Putin's rise to power was concerned, the comprehensive (albeit hardly pro-Putin) book: "Kremlin Rising: Vladimir Putin's Russia and the End of Revolution", provided a detailed interpretation on this.


Last edited by darthvader on Sat Dec 22, 2007 4:49 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
surfguy
Lounge Wizard


Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 6979

PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 3:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Putin, the Kremlin power struggle and the $40bn fortune


Luke Harding in Moscow
Friday December 21, 2007
The Guardian


Russian president Vladimir Putin, whose alleged accumulated wealth of $40bn would make him Europe's richest man. Photograph: Maxim Marmur/AP



An unprecedented battle is taking place inside the Kremlin in advance of Vladimir Putin's departure from office, the Guardian has learned, with claims that the president presides over a secret multibillion-dollar fortune.
Rival clans inside the Kremlin are embroiled in a struggle for the control of assets as Putin prepares to transfer power to his hand-picked successor, Dmitry Medvedev, in May, well-placed political observers and other sources have revealed.

At stake are billions of dollars in assets belonging to Russian state-run corporations. Additionally, details of Putin's own personal fortune, reportedly hidden in Switzerland and Liechtenstein, are being discussed for the first time.

The claims over the president's assets surfaced last month when the Russian political expert Stanislav Belkovsky gave an interview to the German newspaper Die Welt. They have since been repeated in the Washington Post and the Moscow Times, with speculation over the fortune appearing on the internet.
Citing sources inside the president's administration, Belkovsky claims that after eight years in power Putin has secretly accumulated more than $40bn (£20bn). The sum would make him Russia's - and Europe's - richest man.

In an interview with the Guardian, Belkovsky repeated his claims that Putin owns vast holdings in three Russian oil and gas companies, concealed behind a "non-transparent network of offshore trusts".

Putin "effectively" controls 37% of the shares of Surgutneftegaz, an oil exploration company and Russia's third biggest oil producer, worth $20bn, he says. He also owns 4.5% of Gazprom, and "at least 75%" of Gunvor, a mysterious Swiss-based oil trader, founded by Gennady Timchenko, a friend of the president's, Belkovsky alleges.

Asked how much Putin was worth, Belkovsky said: "At least $40bn. Maximum we cannot know. I suspect there are some businesses I know nothing about." He added: "It may be more. It may be much more.

"Putin's name doesn't appear on any shareholders' register, of course. There is a non-transparent scheme of successive ownership of offshore companies and funds. The final point is in Zug [in Switzerland] and Liechtenstein. Vladimir Putin should be the beneficiary owner."

Putin has not commented on Belkovsky's claims. The Guardian put the allegations to the Kremlin but was told Putin's chief spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, was not available.

Discussion of Putin's wealth has previously been taboo. But the claims have leaked out against the backdrop of a fight inside the Kremlin between a group led by Igor Sechin, Putin's influential deputy chief of staff, and a "liberal" clan that includes Medvedev.

The Sechin group is made up of siloviki - Kremlin officials with security/military backgrounds. It is said to include Nikolai Patrushev, the head of the Federal Security Service (FSB), Russia's KGB successor agency, his deputy Alexander Bortnikov, and Putin's aide Viktor Ivanov.

Those associated with the liberal camp include Roman Abramovich, the Russian oligarch and owner of Chelsea football club who is close to Putin and the Yeltsin family. Other members are Viktor Cherkesov, the head of the federal drug control service, and Alisher Usmanov, an Uzbek-born billionaire.

Insiders say the struggle has little to do with ideology. They characterise it as a war between business competitors. Putin's decision to endorse as president Medvedev - who has no links with the secret services - dealt a severe blow to the hardline Sechin clan, they add.

Some analysts have said Putin would like to retire but has been forced to carry on to shield Medvedev from siloviki plotting. Others disagree and say Putin wants to stay in power. On Monday Putin confirmed he intends next year to become Russia's prime minister.

"The siloviki are not at all nice," Yulia Latynina, a Russian political commentator said. Latynina, who hosts a political talkshow on the liberal radio station Ekho Moskvy, was one of the first journalists to draw attention last month to Putin's reported links with Gunvor.

The company is based in Zug, a picturesque Swiss canton known as a bolthole for publicity-shy international businessmen. Gunvor has neither a website nor a Moscow office - but in 2007 posted profits of $8bn on a turnover of $43bn, an astronomic figure, according to industry experts. Like Putin, its reclusive owner, Timchenko, worked in the KGB's foreign affairs directorate. He is said to have met Russia's president in the late 1980s through KGB circles.

Gunvor, which has its head office in Geneva, failed to comment.

Critics say the wave of renationalisations under Putin has transformed Putin's associates into multimillionaires. The dilemma now facing the Kremlin's elite is how to hang on to its wealth if Putin leaves power, experts say. Most of its money is located in the west, they add. The pressing problem is how to protect these funds from any future administration that may seek to reclaim them.

"There's no point in having all this money if you can't travel to the Maldives or Paris and spend it," Elena Panfilova, the director of Transparency International in Russia said.

The first hints of the intra-clan warfare gripping the Kremlin emerged last month, when the FSB arrested General Alexander Bulbov, the deputy head of the federal drug agency, and part of the liberal group. His arrest saw a surreal standoff, with his bodyguards and FSB agents pointing machine guns at each other.

Earlier this month Russia's deputy finance minister, Sergei Storchak - another "liberal" - was also arrested and charged with embezzling $43.4m. He is currently in prison. His boss, Russia's finance minister, Alexei Kudrin, part of the liberal clan, says he is innocent.

But the liberal group - one of several competing factions inside the Kremlin - has struck back. Earlier this month Oleg Shvartsman, a previously obscure businessman, gave an interview to Kommersant newspaper claiming he secretly managed the finances of a group of FSB officers. Their assets were worth £1.6bn, he revealed.

The officers were involved in "velvet reprivatisations", Shvartsman, a fund manager, said - in effect forcibly acquiring private companies at below-market value and transforming them into state-owned firms. These assets were redistributed via offshore companies, he said.

According to Panfilova, the "randomised" corruption of the 1990s has given way to the "systemic and institutionalised corruption" of the Putin era. Members of Putin's cabinet personally control the most important sectors of the economy - oil, gas and defence. Medvedev is chairman of Gazprom; Sechin runs Rosneft; other ministers are chairmen of Russian railways, Aeroflot, a nuclear fuel giant and an energy transport enterprise.

Putin has created a new, more streamlined oligarchy, his critics say. "The crown jewels of the country's wealth have ended up in the hands of Putin's inner circle," Vladimir Rzyhkov - a former independent MP - wrote in Monday's Moscow Times.

Belkovsky - who published a book about Putin's finances last year, and who is the director of the National Strategic Institute, a Moscow thinktank - claims he is confident of his assessment of Putin's hidden wealth. "It's not a secret among the elites,' he said. "But please pay attention that Vladimir Vladimirovich [Putin] has never sued me."

Belkovsky adds that the west has misunderstood Putin and has been distracted by his "neo-Soviet" image. Putin, Belkovsky claims, is ultimately a "classic" businessman who believes money can solve any problem, and whose psychology was shaped by his experiences working in the St Petersburg mayor's office in Russia's crime-ridden early 1990s.

"He is quite sure of this. A problem that can't be resolved with $1bn can be resolved with $10bn, and if not with $10bn then $20bn, and so on," Belkovsky said.

In an interview on Wednesday with Time magazine, which named Putin its person of the year, the president vehemently denied that those inside the Kremlin were corrupt.

Asked whether "some of the people closest to you are getting rich", Putin said: "Then you know who and how. Write to us, to the foreign ministry, if you are so confident. I presume you know the names, you know the systems and the tools.

"I can assure you and everyone who would listen to us, watch us and read us, that the reaction would be swift, immediate, [and] within the prevailing law."
Back to top
greg222
VIP


Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Posts: 599

PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 5:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

darthvader wrote:
As far as Putin's rise to power was concerned, the comprehensive (albeit hardly pro-Putin) book: "Kremlin Rising: Vladimir Putin's Russia and the End of Revolution", provided a detailed interpretation on this.


A whole book? Could you just give me the gist? I'm particularly curious as to how he managed to gain the backing of the Oligarchs, Berezovsky in particular. Did he actively court them or simply not object to their support? And also how he was able to so quickly cement his position and destroy their grip on power - something that would have seemed impossible in the preceeding years.

Surfguy, seems you didn't make this up yourself then. I believe I accused you of that at some point so I guess I owe you an apology. Though I remain very sceptical of Belkovsky's accusations/motives.
Back to top
yorbcbud
Lounge Wizard


Joined: 17 Feb 2006
Posts: 4903
Location: Ñîððåíòî, Áðèòàíñêàÿ Êîëóìáèÿ, Êàíàäà

PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 8:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

greg222 wrote:


Surfguy, seems you didn't make this up yourself then. I believe I accused you of that at some point so I guess I owe you an apology. Though I remain very sceptical of Belkovsky's accusations/motives.


Note the suspicious, and repeated use of the word "alleged" This is no more valid than the original quote that Surfguy posted way back when. Just the same accusations, coming from a different person. Without proof, also just as meaningless.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Way to Russia Talk Lounge Forum Index -> Talk Lounge All times are GMT + 3 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 

Need a Russian Visa? Order below: no reservations needed, flexible itinerary, ready in 1 to 24 hours.